Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than the Moto Z3, getting a 79.8 score against 77.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola One Hyper is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z3, but it's noticeably thicker and a lot heavier.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Motorola One Hyper features a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola One Hyper takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger diafragm aperture and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola One Hyper features longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Motorola One Hyper costs more money than Motorola Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.