Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than Moto Z3, having an 80 score against 77.6. Motorola One Zoom's design is newer than Moto Z3's, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Moto Z3 features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, a just a little less pixels per screen inch and a quite smaller screen. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Zoom counts with better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 33% more battery size. Motorola One Zoom shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z3. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto Z3, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.