Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Polar night |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G has an overall score of 80.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 score. Nokia 8.3 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z3, but it is a lot heavier and thicker. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Nokia 8.3 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Nokia 8.3 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z3 has a little bit better screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display density.
The Moto Z3 has just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a bigger back camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z3. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto Z3, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.