Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is just a bit better than the Moto Z3, with an 80.3 score against 77.6. Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a newer device than Moto Z3, although it is much thicker and incredibly heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Moto Z3 has just a bit better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels per inch of display. The Moto Z3 features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit superior processor than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a lot larger camera sensor, a bigger camera aperture, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back camera with a way better resolution.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a way better battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto Z3, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.