Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. Although the Nokia XR20 is newer than the Moto Z3, it's extremely heavier and incredibly thicker. These phones work with Android OS, but the Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nokia XR20 counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger display. The Moto Z3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia XR20, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia XR20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Nokia XR20 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Nokia XR20 has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 54% bigger battery size.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z3. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z3, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.