Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 has a score of 77.6, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Moto Z3's body is a lot lighter and notably thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Both of these devices use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System).
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a display that's very similar to the Motorola Moto Z3 one, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a little inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z3, because it has a way better video definition, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations, a camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Moto Z3 counts with a better memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola Moto Z3 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.