Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, having a 77.6 score against 76.2. Motorola Moto Z3 is an much older phone than nubia Red Magic 5S, but Motorola was able to make it much lighter and notably thinner. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Motorola Moto Z3 has newer 9.0 Pie version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a bit inferior pixels count in each display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5S captures greater pictures and videos than Moto Z3, because it has a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a much higher resolution, a way higher video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Motorola Moto Z3 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.