Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-16 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is slightly better than Galaxy A16 5G, having a 77.6 score against 76.2. Moto Z3's body is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than the Galaxy A16 5G. These phones include Android operating system, but the Moto Z3 has newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a little more vivid display than Moto Z3, because although it has a little inferior pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy A16 5G features a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. The Moto Z3 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A16 5G features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs more than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A16 5G. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Moto Z3, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A16 5G, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.