Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. Galaxy A22 5G is a much newer phone than Motorola Moto Z3, but it's much thicker and noticeably heavier. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A22 5G. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A22 5G and Moto Z3 have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A22 5G has a bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger aperture. The Moto Z3 features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.