Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the Moto Z3, with a overall score of 79.9 against 77.6. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a a lot newer phone than Moto Z3, but it's somewhat thicker and a lot heavier.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z3, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Galaxy A25 5G features a better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos, a larger sensor and a way higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.