Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z3, although it's noticeably thicker and heavier.
The Moto Z3 and the Galaxy A31 both have similar displays, although the Galaxy A31 also has a little bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Moto Z3 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A31. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A31 takes much better photographs and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy A31 features a way better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.