Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a general score of 79.4, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z3, although it's noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has older 14 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Moto Z3 counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture for better images in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.