Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 has a global score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3's overall score of 77.6. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A41 has the older 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A41's body is newer and a little lighter than the Moto Z3's, but it's also thicker.
Moto Z3 has a little better performance than Galaxy A41. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto Z3, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little larger display and a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 takes better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a lot more MP camera.
Moto Z3 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A41 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.