Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Moto Z3, with a general score of 83.8 against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Moto Z3. Motorola Moto Z3 features a little better performance than Galaxy A50. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A50 features a display that's very similar to Moto Z3's display, although the Galaxy A50 also has a little bit higher pixel amount per inch of display, a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A50 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50 has greater battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.