Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3, having a overall score of 86.6 against 77.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A50s body is newer, but just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3.
Moto Z3 and Samsung Galaxy A50s both count with very similar screens, although the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a just a bit better pixels density, a quite bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Motorola Moto Z3 has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a CPU that is very similar to the Moto Z3 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A50s features greater battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy A50s takes a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A50s also has a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.