Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than Motorola Moto Z3, having a overall score of 90.8 against 77.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G is newer than the Motorola Moto Z3, it is heavier and way thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a display that's just as good as Motorola Moto Z3's display, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a just a little greater pixels density, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite larger display. The Moto Z3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F2 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit more storage for games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A51 5G has a really longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G costs a bit more than the Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.