Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Moto Z3, getting a 90.7 score against 77.6. Galaxy A52 is a newer phone than Moto Z3, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Moto Z3 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z3 and the Galaxy A52 both count with similar displays, although the Galaxy A52 also has a bit greater display pixel density, a quite bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A52 has a much longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity. Galaxy A52 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger aperture, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.