Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Moto Z3, with a score of 91.3 against 77.6. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is extremely newer than the Moto Z3's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A52 5G and Motorola Moto Z3 count with extremely similar screens, although the Galaxy A52 5G also has a little bigger screen, a quite greater pixel number per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit more memory for apps and games than Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto Z3 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A52 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G takes way better videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, a bigger aperture and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.