Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a score of 77.6 against 76.9. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, providing the user some extra features. The Motorola Moto Z3 is a lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A70, even though they were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite better screen density. The Motorola Moto Z3 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Moto Z3 takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photos or video in low-light environments and a tinier sensor, they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition. Motorola Moto Z3 has a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Moto Z3 is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy A70.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.