Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 has 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy A71 body is newer than Moto Z3's, but it's heavier and a little bit thicker.
The Moto Z3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Moto Z3 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 has a greater camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Moto Z3 features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A71, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy A71 is more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.