Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is better than Moto Z3's overall score of 77.6. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer phone than Moto Z3, but it is heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little better performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a screen that's just as good as Moto Z3's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z3, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.