Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-08-16 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is slightly better than Galaxy C5, getting a 77.6 score against 76.4. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Although Moto Z3 is notably newer than the Galaxy C5, it is a little bit thicker and just a little heavier.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C5. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Moto Z3 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy C5, because although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a bigger display.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy C5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos and a back facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition. The Motorola Moto Z3 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z3 features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy C5, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.