Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-08-16 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 score. Samsung Galaxy C7 is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than Moto Z3, but both have the same thickness. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy C7 has older 8.0 Oreo version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Moto Z3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C7, because it has a little bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a quite better display pixels density. The Moto Z3 has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z3 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy C7. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy C7 features a little longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size. Moto Z3 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.