Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 is slightly better than Moto Z3, getting a score of 84.6 against 77.6. Galaxy F23's construction is incredibly newer and lighter, but thicker than Moto Z3. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F23 has older 12 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy F23 has a display that's just as good as the display in Moto Z3, because although the Galaxy F23 has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2408 resolution and a quite larger screen. The Motorola Moto Z3 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy F23. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Moto Z3 counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy F23 counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
The Moto Z3 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.