Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Moto Z3's 77.6 score. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS, but the Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Galaxy F41 is noticeably newer than Moto Z3, it is somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker.
The Galaxy F41 features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little larger display and a little better pixels count in each inch of screen. Galaxy F41 and Motorola Moto Z3 count with incredibly similar processors, and although the Galaxy F41 has more RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
Moto Z3 features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy F41 features a really longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 100 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.