Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. The Galaxy F62 body is newer, but much heavier and much thicker than Motorola Moto Z3. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Moto Z3 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a little worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way more MP back facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.