Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is much better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. The Galaxy M51 is a extremely newer phone than Moto Z3, but it's extremely thicker and way heavier. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy M51, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Moto Z3 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per display inch.
The Moto Z3 counts with a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.