Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Moto Z3's general score of 77.6. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy Note 3 is a much older, just a bit heavier and thicker device than Moto Z3.
The Moto Z3 has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3, although it has a little smaller display, a quite lower count of pixels per screen inch and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Moto Z3 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z3 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 3200mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Note 3 takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.