Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a newer phone than Motorola Moto Z3, but it's thicker and just a little heavier. The Galaxy Note10 has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Moto Z3 and the Galaxy Note10 feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280. Moto Z3 features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Galaxy Note10 features a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note10 also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a larger sensor taking better quality photos and videos.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z3. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto Z3, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.