Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is better than Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is newer than Motorola Moto Z3, it's heavier and way thicker.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a screen that's very similar to Motorola Moto Z3's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a little better performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy Note10 Lite takes clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a 12 mega-pixels camera in the back, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has better video frame rates, a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.