Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3, getting a general score of 77.7 against 77.6. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy Note3 has the previous 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Note3 is a much older, somewhat thicker and a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z3.
Moto Z3 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Moto Z3 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2160, a little bigger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Moto Z3 counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note3 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note3 and Moto Z3 both feature incredibly similar cameras, because although the Galaxy Note3 has a smaller aperture and a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a camera in the back with a better 13 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.