Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3, with a score of 77.6 against 77.6. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy Note4 construction is notably older, thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto Z3. Galaxy Note4 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto Z3 features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note4, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note4 has a little bit better camera than Moto Z3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy Note4 also counts with a back camera with much more MP and a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy Note4 has a bit better battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 3220mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.