Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is just a bit better than Moto Z3, getting a overall score of 79.5 against 77.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note7 is better than the Moto Z3, it must be told that it's also a much older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker device. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Moto Z3 has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto Z3 also has a higher number of cores (and also faster). Motorola Moto Z3 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 17% bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Note7's camera is very similar to the camera in Moto Z3, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a larger camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos and a bigger camera aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.