Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the Moto Z3, with a 93.6 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction is newer than Moto Z3's, although it is incredibly heavier and thicker. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little larger display, a just a little better amount of pixels in each display inch and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a lot larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, higher video frame rate and a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs.
The Moto Z3 has a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy S10 5G costs more money than the Motorola Moto Z3, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.