Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Moto Z3, with an 89.7 score against 77.6. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the Moto Z3. Motorola Moto Z3 and Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite feature really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a back camera with lot more megapixels and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.