Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is just a little lighter but somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z3, and they were released with only a couple months difference. Galaxy S10e features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels per inch of display and a quite better 1080 x 2280 resolution.
Galaxy S10e counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z3 has a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a way bigger aperture for better images and video in low light environments, a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and better video frame rate.
The Galaxy S10e is more expensive than the Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.