Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than Motorola Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. The Galaxy S20 FE is a way newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z3, although it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S20 FE has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z3, because it has a quite bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit greater display density.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures, a larger camera aperture for better photography in low light situations and higher video frame rates.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a much longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than the Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.