Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is much better than the Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is extremely newer, but a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than Moto Z3. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite higher number of pixels per inch of display and a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a way bigger sensor and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos. The Moto Z3 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
Galaxy S22 is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z3, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.