Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-16 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 5.50 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than Moto Z3, getting a general score of 82.6 against 77.6. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S25's design is way thinner and notably lighter than Moto Z3.
Galaxy S25 features a more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite better pixel quantity in each display inch and a bit larger display. Motorola Moto Z3 has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 features improved battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S25 counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto Z3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.