Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-16 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 5.50 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Moto Z3, having a 90.7 score against 77.6. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is a lot thinner and much lighter than the Moto Z3.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Moto Z3, because it has a little bit greater amount of pixels in each screen inch, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Moto Z3 features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z3 has a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a way higher video resolution, a larger camera aperture for better images in low light situations, a back camera with much more megapixels and a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.