Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has the previous 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a better phone than Motorola Moto Z3, it must be noted that it is also a way older, much thicker and a little heavier phone.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a bit better pixel count per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a processor that's just as good as Moto Z3's processing unit, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Galaxy S5 Sport shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z3, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Moto Z3 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. Moto Z3 counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit more expensive than the Moto Z3, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.