Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an older 8.0 Oreo version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z3, but it's much heavier and notably thicker.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster processor than Moto Z3. Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z3 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture and a smaller sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have a 12 MP camera in the back, the Motorola Moto Z3 also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z3. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Moto Z3, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.