Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is newer than the Moto Z3's, but it's a little thicker and heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z3, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola Moto Z3 has a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size. Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Z Flip also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger sensor taking better quality photographs and a bigger aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some money and get the Moto Z3, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.