Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is much better than Moto Z3's score of 77.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body has the same thickness than Moto Z3, but it's somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
The Moto Z3 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z3 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have a same resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Moto Z3, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.