Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Motorola Moto Z3, getting a 92.3 score against 77.6. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is newer, but heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the display, a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger aperture.
Moto Z3 features more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than Moto Z3, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.