Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Moto Z3, getting a 94.6 score against 77.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body has the same thickness than the Moto Z3, but it's notably heavier.
The Motorola Moto Z3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 feature really similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208. Moto Z3 has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 12 MP camera in the back, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger aperture, better video frame rate and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a really longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z3. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Moto Z3, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.