Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is much better than Moto Z3's overall score of 77.6. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner than Moto Z3's, but it is heavier.
Moto Z3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the display. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z3 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a camera with a 12 MP resolution, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.