Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is just a bit better than Moto Z3, having a global score of 82.9 against 77.6. Both of these devices use the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a newer cellphone than Moto Z3, although it is heavier and extremely thicker. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little better pixel density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture and faster video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.