Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has the previous 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Xiaomi Black Shark 4's construction is extremely newer than the Moto Z3's, although it is noticeably thicker and much heavier.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a better screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display. Moto Z3 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has faster video frame rates, a camera with much more mega-pixels, a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is way more expensive than the Moto Z3, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.