Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3, getting a general score of 78.2 against 77.6. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S body is much newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto Z3. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because it has a little bit better pixels density, a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger display. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto Z3 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a superior battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto Z3, because it has a camera with way more MP and a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.